Cecil Transit
Cecil Transit carried 94,070 boardings in FY2025 at $34.81 per ride and $33.54 in subsidy per ride. Ten years of NTD data, by mode.
What those two numbers mean
Passengers aboard is passenger miles divided by vehicle miles: how many people are on board on average, at any moment. It is the missing term in cost per ride. A service carrying twenty people per vehicle mile and one carrying half a person can spend the same on fuel and wages and arrive at wildly different costs per passenger.
Average speed is vehicle miles divided by vehicle hours, including every stop and every red light. It is the hidden term in cost per mile, because cost per mile is cost per hour divided by speed. A bus network slowing from 13 mph to 11 becomes a fifth more expensive per mile with no change in wages and no change in service.
By the numbers
By the numbers
FY2025 unless noted. Each figure is computed from what the agency filed with NTD, and set against something to read it by.
Operating cost less fares, per person in the service area the agency reports. Agencies draw those areas very differently, so this is set against peers.
Median of similar agencies: $28
Revenue hours bought from a private operator or another agency rather than run in-house. Nationally, much of this is paratransit.
U.S. transit: 27% of service hours
For 34% of rides: $48.16 a ride, against $28.06 on the rest of its service. Door-to-door trips carry one or two people at a time. It includes paratransit, which federal law requires for riders whose disability keeps them off the fixed routes; where a separate agency runs the region's paratransit, its cost is not here.
Similar agencies: 23% of operating cost. U.S. demand response: $52.35 a ride.
A journey with a transfer counts as two rides, because NTD counts each boarding.
The year's boardings divided by 365. Weekdays run higher, weekends lower.
Profile
Agency profile
As filed with the National Transit Database.
Contact
- Legal name
- Cecil County Government
- Doing business as
- Cecil Transit
- Address
-
200 CHESAPEAKE BLVD
PO Box 21921
Elkton, MD 21921-6653 - Website
- http://www.ceciltransit.com/
Organization
- Organization type
- City, County or Local Government Unit or Department of Transportation
- Reporter type
- Reduced Reporter
- Fiscal year ends
- June 30, 2025
- Reporting since
- FY2015
Service area
- Population served
- 102,383 over 346 sq mi
- Density
- 296 people per sq mi
- Urbanized area
- Philadelphia, PA--NJ--DE--MD · 5.7M people
- Vehicles at maximum service
- 19
Services operated
Each mode has its own page, with its own ridership, cost and safety.
Ridership
Ridership
Cecil Transit reports annually. NTD publishes monthly figures for full reporters only.
Monthly boardings
NTD publishes monthly figures for full reporters only. This agency reports annually, so its ridership appears in the yearly chart alongside.
Annual boardings
Ten-year series
Cost
Cost and subsidy
Dollar figures are shown as reported and again in 2024 dollars.
Cost and subsidy per ride
As reported
In 2024 dollars
The same series with inflation removed
Why cost per ride moved
Indexed to FY2015 = 100, in constant dollars
Cost per ride is the cost of an hour of service divided by the riders carried in that hour. It can only rise for two reasons: service got dearer to produce, or fewer people rode it.
Since FY2015, in constant dollars, an hour of service costs 72% more to run and carries 28% fewer riders. Most of the rise in cost per ride is the service itself getting dearer.
Across all U.S. bus service over the same years, an hour costs 14% more to run and carries 26% fewer riders.
Where the money goes
Operating cost by function
Who pays for it
Federal, state and local funding, 2007 to 2024
Operating and capital money together, in the dollars of each year. Fares are not in this file — FTA took them out of the funding series in 2022 — so "directly generated" here means advertising, concessions, park and ride and taxes the agency levies itself. The farebox is charted above.
Capital
Capital spending
What was spent on building, rebuilding and replacing, shown beside the cost of running the service rather than folded into it.
Capital spending, 2012 to 2024
In 2024 dollars, so the years can be compared. This is the series the estimate above is built from.
Operating and capital, per ride
Stacked, but counted separately. The two are different kinds of number.
Building, or keeping what exists
FY2025. NTD records which of the two every dollar was reported under.
Who pays for what
FY2025. Running the service and building it are funded by different governments.
| Spending | Total | Federal | State | Local | Fares and own revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| operating | $3.27M | 51.4% | 11.4% | 33.5% | 3.7% |
| capital | $383.1K | 37.2% | 12.9% | 49.9% | 0% |
Fares offset the cost of running the service. They do not meaningfully offset capital, which is why subsidy per ride on this site is an operating figure and stays one.
What these capital figures are not
- Spending is not the same as cost
- NTD reports what an agency spent on capital in a year, not what its capital cost it that year. Those differ: a system opened in 1904 spends almost nothing on tunnels while consuming an enormous inherited asset every day, and an agency that bought a fleet last year spent a fortune once and will spend nothing for a decade.
- Vehicles can be depreciated. Everything else cannot.
- FTA's capital series runs from 1992, which covers a bus fleet's working life more than twice over, so averaging rolling-stock spending across one replacement cycle gives a defensible figure for what the fleet costs each year. Track, tunnels, bridges and stations last forty to a hundred years or more. Thirty-three years of spending on those measures recent investment policy, not consumption, so no figure is published for them.
- The vehicle figure is an estimate
- Cost per ride including vehicles is arithmetic on published spending rather than a published number, and it assumes the agency has been replacing vehicles at roughly the rate it wears them out. Each agency's page says how far that assumption holds for it. It covers vehicles only: no track, no tunnels, no stations.
- Year-by-year capital is lumpy
- Capital arrives in bursts. A single year of it says more about where an agency sits in its replacement cycle than about the cost of carrying a passenger, which is why the per-ride averages here run across every year available.
- Fares do not pay for it
- Fare revenue offsets operating cost. It does not meaningfully offset capital, which is funded almost entirely by government. Subsidy per ride on this site is an operating figure and stays that way.
Capital spending by year and use
| Year | Guideway | Stations | Vehicles | Maintenance buildings | Fare collection | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $383.1K |
| 2024 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $455.4K |
| 2023 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $440.9K |
| 2022 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $835.7K |
Peers
Compared with similar systems
82 agencies serve an urbanized area of similar size, carry a similar number of riders, and run bus as their main service.
Cost per ride against peers
This agency in blue, peer median dashed
Rides per resident against peers
How much the place uses what it has
Peer detail
| Agency | Urbanized area | Population | Boardings | Rides / resident | Cost / ride | Subsidy / ride | Fare recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecil Transit this agency | Philadelphia, PA--NJ--DE--MD | 5.7M | 94.1K | 0.92 | $34.81 | $33.54 | 3.7% |
| Miami--Fort Lauderdale, FL | 6.08M | 96.1K | 1.63 | $10.20 | — | — | |
| Philadelphia, PA--NJ--DE--MD | 5.7M | 85.7K | 0.17 | $38.76 | $38.76 | 0% | |
| Atlanta, GA | 5.1M | 97.9K | 0.69 | $40.97 | $40.02 | 2.3% | |
| Philadelphia, PA--NJ--DE--MD | 5.7M | 114.4K | 2.12 | $24.29 | $22.46 | 7.5% | |
| Miami--Fort Lauderdale, FL | 6.08M | 75.1K | 2.03 | $4.64 | — | — | |
| California Non-UZA | 4.36M | 89.8K | — | $17.50 | $15.61 | 10.8% | |
| Pennsylvania Non-UZA | 4.2M | 91.3K | — | $24.45 | $14.15 | 42.1% | |
| Miami--Fort Lauderdale, FL | 6.08M | 71.7K | 0.64 | $7.12 | — | — | |
| California Non-UZA | 4.36M | 86.8K | — | $17.11 | $12.05 | 29.6% | |
| California Non-UZA | 4.36M | 83.5K | — | $9.88 | $9.09 | 8% | |
| Peer median (82 agencies) | 0.77 | $23.73 | $23.88 | 4.8% | |||
By mode
By mode
Each service this agency runs, for FY2025. Directly operated and purchased service are summed.
Boardings by mode
Annual, stacked
Cost per ride by mode
FY2025
Mode detail, FY2025
Safety
Safety
Collisions, fires, derailments and security events reported to NTD. Only complete years are shown.
Safety
Safety and security events are published in the monthly file, which covers full reporters only. This agency does not appear in it.
Fleet
Fleet, workforce and reliability
How old the vehicles are, how many people run them, and how far they get between breakdowns.
How the fleet has aged, 2012 to 2024
Average vehicle age, weighted across every mode the agency runs
A rising line is not automatically bad and a falling one is not automatically good: a fleet gets younger the year an agency takes delivery, and older every year it does not. What the shape shows is whether replacement is steady or comes in bursts. The table below says how many vehicles are actually past the life FTA expects of them.
Vehicles, and how many are accessible
Active revenue vehicles against those meeting the ADA standard
Fleet age
FTA's default useful life benchmark for each class, from the Transit Asset Management rule
| Vehicle type | Count | Average age | FTA benchmark | Past FTA benchmark | Past own benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cutaway | 32 | 5.53 yrs | 10 yrs |
|
|
| Minivan | 5 | 4 yrs | 8 yrs |
|
All years
Full annual series
Every year this agency reported, as published.
| Year | Boardings | Passenger miles | Revenue miles | Revenue hours | Operating cost | Fares | Cost / ride | Subsidy / ride | Fare recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 94,070 | — | 530,575 | 27,392 | $3,274,429 | $119,646 | $34.81 | $33.54 | 3.7% |
| 2024 | 89,573 | — | 520,050 | 28,508 | $2,752,745 | $112,364 | $30.73 | $29.48 | 4.1% |
| 2023 | 76,296 | — | 481,785 | 27,029 | $2,523,050 | $107,898 | $33.07 | $31.66 | 4.3% |
| 2022 | 54,240 | — | 423,413 | 21,337 | $2,138,803 | $77,575 | $39.43 | $38.00 | 3.6% |
| 2021 | 41,878 | — | 374,193 | 19,748 | $1,793,201 | $60,709 | $42.82 | $41.37 | 3.4% |
| 2020 | 79,770 | — | 449,751 | 21,870 | $1,855,119 | $108,082 | $23.26 | $21.90 | 5.8% |
| 2019 | 103,880 | — | 566,695 | 25,845 | $1,906,028 | $139,531 | $18.35 | $17.01 | 7.3% |
| 2018 | 96,995 | — | 474,702 | 22,412 | $1,605,423 | $133,650 | $16.55 | $15.17 | 8.3% |
| 2017 | 97,043 | — | 467,063 | 22,084 | $1,422,991 | $130,379 | $14.66 | $13.32 | 9.2% |
| 2016 | 126,911 | — | 476,598 | 28,020 | $1,508,555 | $121,749 | $11.89 | $10.93 | 8.1% |
| 2015 | 99,691 | — | 387,387 | 20,952 | $1,072,700 | $139,704 | $10.76 | $9.36 | 13% |